<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jandy's Meanderings - Latest Comments</title><link>http://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:12:42 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 1980s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-1980s/#comment-6068285957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bb78ed4ae6a0197de395d5a0daace3091588489aea7d830f667e6a47b4fbcbd9.gif" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/bb78ed4ae6a0197de395d5a0daace3091588489aea7d830f667e6a47b4fbcbd9.gif"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric Neiman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:12:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 1920s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-1920s/#comment-6068285665</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d89a08108a735007d07ce8ee9df03fbbf5d04a8eb43273809a040ffd30b11ee7.gif" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d89a08108a735007d07ce8ee9df03fbbf5d04a8eb43273809a040ffd30b11ee7.gif"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DreadLight</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:12:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Films I&amp;#8217;ve Seen</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/#comment-6068285465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/025aced43fc9a0e4b1a2c15f54ead474c1667280174f832c02ce26aaa103eee6.gif" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/025aced43fc9a0e4b1a2c15f54ead474c1667280174f832c02ce26aaa103eee6.gif"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tesroy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:11:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rock Climbing</title><link>https://www.the-frame.com/blog/2022/11/rock-climbing/#comment-6068285315</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d0cf4fb8d1282a4c8048986f0b79503612cd88fda2fd9d4558f26799f76687c1.png" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d0cf4fb8d1282a4c8048986f0b79503612cd88fda2fd9d4558f26799f76687c1.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JHunter23</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 1930s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-1930s/#comment-6068285312</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a98d0afd3b7c99c9a292f0c5a875d0cbdf0df46e6d9c221c0ac29797c85892dd.png" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a98d0afd3b7c99c9a292f0c5a875d0cbdf0df46e6d9c221c0ac29797c85892dd.png"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Riger</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2022 08:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seven Ways to Be a Misogynist in Repulsion</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2014/10/seven-ways-to-be-a-misogynist-in-repulsion/#comment-5824533928</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's fiction coming from the mind of a pedo.  No need to analyze it the way you did, you should analyze the pedo and wonder why he created the characters the way he did.  It's really an awful film, just another portrayal of women as sexually-repressed crazies, this one coming from a guy who drugged and sodomized a teen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Samantha</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 20:15:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Featured Video: Pierrot le fou meets The Pixies</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2008/05/featured-video-pierrot-le-fou-meets-the-pixies/#comment-4869051520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;did you ever save a copy of this video? I absolutely loved it and can't find it any longer...My research turned up your post :-) and using the URL from your post I even found it on the Wayback Machine, but couldn't view it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">frankmc</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:02:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: To Ponder &amp;#8211; The New Wave, Modern or Postmodern?</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2007/06/to-ponder-the-new-wave-modern-or-postmodern/#comment-4459210101</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's surreal to respond to an 12-year-old comment, but you sparkled an amazing insight: "I've had a hard time buying that his obsession with imitating low-art was no more than an attempt to appear less nerdy, and more cool among audiences -- much like how Tarantino is today." Thank you&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luis Fernando Imperator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2019 00:00:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Great St Louis to Los Angeles Road Trip</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2008/06/the-great-st-louis-to-los-angeles-road-trip/#comment-3686253949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;12/30/17  Had just heard about the king Tut exhibit and was wondering if I could do the drive from St.Louis to LA.  Found you and grabbed the couch to read this. It felt like my old road trips in my 20's . Loved the pics and appreciated taking the ride with you..Kudos to you and your adventures !!!! Hope your dreams come true!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 19:35:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 1990s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-1990s/#comment-3665597983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Now those are both films I’ve seen and don’t like very much. *shrug*&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:31:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 2010s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-2010s/#comment-3665596865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s an omission in my viewing! My time got way more limited in 2013, and I’ve prioritized classics, so all the lists from 2013 on suffer from far fewer viewings per year.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:29:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 1990s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-1990s/#comment-3665499742</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Where the hell are "Shawshank" and "Forrest Gump"?!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin McDonough</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:03:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Top Tens: 2010s</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/watching/films-ive-seen/my-top-tens-2010s/#comment-3665496474</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"12 Years a Slave" is easily the best film of 2013. Talk about a glaring omission.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin McDonough</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 15:00:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 52: Autumn Sonata</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2017/02/challenge-week-52-autumn-sonata/#comment-3386714403</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great review here. This one certainly isn't easy to take, but I did get a lot more from it on my second viewing. But you're so right, it is very emotionally devastating.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Withrow</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:30:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 47: The Ghost and Mrs. Muir</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/12/challenge-week-47-the-ghost-and-mrs-muir/#comment-3070084493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree! I think that was one of my major reservations about it.  It's actually strange how the film treats all this as normal, even desirable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 16:36:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 47: The Ghost and Mrs. Muir</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/12/challenge-week-47-the-ghost-and-mrs-muir/#comment-3056069937</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Harrison and Sanders together in a film. That makes it worth watching if nothing else.:) I had mixed feelings about this one. There's something nostalgic and lovely about it, but there's also that sense that a widow has nothing to look forward to but love for a dead guy who isn't her dead husband. A bit of an odd message:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carygrantwonteatyou</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:51:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 43: True Stories</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-43-true-stories/#comment-3013687452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I definitely think I'll like it more on a rewatch, when I know what to expect. Usually I like going in blind, but sometimes knowing more helps. :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 16:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 43: True Stories</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-43-true-stories/#comment-3013646309</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love how weird True Stories is, but it only really grabbed me when I watched it a second time. My wife is also a huge fan of David Byrne and the movie, so her enthusiasm didn't hurt. I can definitely understand your reaction, especially if you don't know as much about the Talking Heads. I love the karaoke scene so much. And the fashion show is so wonderfully odd!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Heaton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 43: The Collector</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-43-the-collector/#comment-3012571998</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I remember you mentioning about the Code approval, but obviously you didn't tell me exactly what the issue was. I assumed the suggestions of nudity in the bathroom scene, but you're right, the ending isn't compliant either. But the ending is perfect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:50:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 43: The Collector</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-43-the-collector/#comment-3012403883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can live with you being middle-of-the-road on True Stories because I'm very pleased that you ended up liking this one. I think this one does the story the right way. It's uncomfortable and upsetting, but it never goes for gore or goes for the cheap, prurient route.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love Terrence Stamp in this, but it's Eggar who really makes the movie for me. I was pretty invested throughout, but the moment that she wakes up in her basement prison and slowly discovers just how much planning has gone into this--the wardrobe of clothing her size, etc. is truly chilling, and it's all reflected in her face as she scans the room.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't know how much research you do on the films after you've seen them. The story on The Collector is that since the ending doesn't conform to the Hays Code, it shouldn't have been approved, but allegedly the censor fell asleep before the end and passed it without going back and watching what was missed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SJHoneywell</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:10:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 42: Millennium Actress</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-42-millennium-actress/#comment-3007972475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I already can't wait to watch it again. This time enthralled me, but I can definitely see digging deeper being rewarding.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The chaos in Paprika turned me off a little. I know it's supposed to be a dream world or something, but it just got to be a little much. I would like to see it again. Tokyo Godfathers is really good. And Perfect Blue I've seen, but I really don't remember a thing about it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 42: Millennium Actress</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/11/challenge-week-42-millennium-actress/#comment-3002245768</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I watched Millennium Actress a few years back and was intrigued by it. It's one of those films that I really need to go back and watch again. There was so much to take in with the plot and also with the themes behind it. I've only seen Paprika in terms of Kon's other movies. I liked its total chaos but also felt a little distant from it at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Heaton</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:37:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 37: Requiem for a Dream</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/10/challenge-week-37-requiem-for-a-dream/#comment-2944209671</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm in a similar boat with Requiem for a Dream. I admire the filmmaking but don't plan to ever watch it again. It's just such a bleak look at humanity that it was a real struggle. I don't mind a challenging viewing, but it was too much.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Heaton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2016 00:01:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 36: Paris, Texas</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/10/challenge-week-36-paris-texas/#comment-2936851053</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm so glad you finally saw this film! It does have a meandering quality to it (which is common with a lot of Wenders films), but it really clicked with me on a repeat viewing. That final scene with Stanton and Kinski is so moving.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Heaton</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 16:17:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Challenge Week 31: Barcelona and The Last Days of Disco</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2016/08/challenge-week-31-barcelona-and-the-last-days-of-disco/#comment-2854917026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So glad you enjoyed these Jandy! If you can locate it, I'd highly recommend the Amazon pilot for the Cosmopolitans, which is in the same wheelhouse. Damsels in Distress is also good, and I still need to see his new film. I cannot get enough of Chris Eigeman! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dan Heaton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:12:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>