<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jandy's Meanderings - Latest Comments in Word (and words) (and modernism)</title><link>http://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/jandy8217s_meanderings_raquo_word_and_words_and_modernism/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:06:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Word (and words) (and modernism)</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2006/10/word-and-words-and-modernism/#comment-1749180</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I think in a sense, pomo can mean whatever you want it to mean...that's the inclusivity of it.  ;)  I wasn't expecting there to be that much difference between modernisms, though.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What book was it?  I might have to check it out...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:06:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Word (and words) (and modernism)</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2006/10/word-and-words-and-modernism/#comment-1749179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wouldn't be surprised.  Reading a book on postmodernism led me to think that there are seveal forms of pomo for various disciplines--architecture, art, lit, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jennifer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 00:53:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>