<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jandy's Meanderings - Latest Comments in The Aesthetic of the Moment</title><link>http://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/jandy8217s_meanderings_raquo_the_aesthetic_of_the_moment/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:01:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Aesthetic of the Moment</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2006/06/the-aesthetic-of-the-moment/#comment-1748841</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We must both be geniuses!  Yeah, there's a 'feel' to independent film...to the extent that some mainstream films seem independent to me, and vice versa.  It hit me yesterday that I think it's this focus on 'moments' rather than the whole plot that gives a film that indie feel.  Wes Anderson films are sort of in the middle, as you say.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jandy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:01:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Aesthetic of the Moment</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2006/06/the-aesthetic-of-the-moment/#comment-1748840</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was thinking the very same thing, yesterday.  You must be a genius.  I was was revisiting The Life Aquatic in my mind (which is more of a mainstream independent film I guess).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">george edema</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:16:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>