<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jandy's Meanderings - Latest Comments in Blogs and 18th Century Periodicals</title><link>http://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://jandysmeanderings.disqus.com/jandy8217s_meanderings_raquo_blogs_and_18th_century_periodicals/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:26:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogs and 18th Century Periodicals</title><link>http://www.the-frame.com/2007/02/blogs-and-18th-century-periodicals/#comment-1749832</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Editor: &lt;br&gt;Knowing NOTHING about 18th century periodicals, and not much about blogging, other than reading some from time to time, I find that comparison interesting, and right on.  I confess to have spent 2 1/2 hours in the early AM this morning to reading a technical blog (a large part of that was listening to 1 1/2 hours of podcast on the upcoming problem of all the Calendering systems that must be patched to deal with our legislature's changing the Daylight Saving Time by 3 weeks this spring, and 1 week this fall, and why you will not know when the meeting is for three weeks, and if you don't fix it right, you will not know after that either....&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bottom line of this:  Yes, it was like a magazine article, good content, timely, important, and in the case of the blog, very current (didn't have to wait for the presses to run....).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dad</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:26:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>